Hence, researchers distinguish stress coping (1) that is focused on a problem, i.e. Lazarus and Folkman, in their relational theory of stress coping, perceive it as a dynamic process aimed at sufficient management of external and internal demands that are appraised by individuals as taxing or exceeding their resources (Lazarus and Folkman 1984). The ability to cope with them is a vital competence that should be developed. Resilience was a significant predictor solely with regard to seeking contact with other people.ĭifficult situations happen in everyone’s life. Further analysis of the two forms of avoidance-oriented styles demonstrate that the sense of coherence variable was a significant predictor of both engaging in substitute activities and seeking contact with other people. Significant predictors of avoidance-oriented styles were the sense of coherence and resilience variables. Participants’ emotion-oriented style was negatively related with not just the sense of coherence variable, but also with self-efficacy and resilience. The relationship between participants’ sense of coherence and task-oriented style was non-significant. Both traits related to a task-oriented style to a similar extent. The results demonstrate a positive relationship between both self-efficacy and resilience with a task-oriented style of coping.
The study was conducted with a group of 632 students.
In this study, all personality predictors were included in one model. In the study, we have attempted to establish which traits play a crucial role in the prediction of tendencies applicable to a specific style of stress coping. The purpose of this study was to identify the personality predictors of individuals with a stress coping style.
0 kommentar(er)
